Skip to main navigation Skip to page content
Indiana University Northwest

Strategic Planning Committee

Outcome 5

2005 Strategic Planning Outcome 5 Timeline

  • Product 1: Vice Chancellors will prioritize support programs.
  • Product 2: Deans and Directors will prioritize academic support programs.
  • Product 3: Determination of future of academic programs in 3rd Tier.

 Product 1: Vice Chancellors will prioritize support programs.
Completion Dates
Actions
Responsilility
Report
March 1, 2005 The VCs will review criteria
  • Previously considered criteria will be reviewed to determine if these criteria are still valid.
  • Establish criteria for program definition.
Cabinet Marilyn Vasquez
March 1, 2005 The VCs will agree on the report form
  • Form needs to be developed.
Cabinet Marilyn Vasquez
March 1, 2005 The VCs will identify all support programs
  • Discussion on previous methodology of identifying programs.
  • Review to program list to determine if all support programs have been identified.
Cabinet Marilyn Vasquez
August 2, 2005 Begin prioritization process
  • Score all programs on evaluation form
Cabinet  
December 6, 2005 Complete prioritization process
  • Put programs into growth, sustain, and redevelopment categories based on ratings.
  • Report by completing program priority chart.
Cabinet Marilyn Vasquez

Product 2: Deans and Directors will prioritize academic support programs.
Completion Dates
Actions
Responsilbilty
Report
April 5, 2005
Decide on criteria for review
  • Review program priority criteria and adapt to academic support programs
  • Do we need to check with Cabinet on the criteria they are using to define a program?
All Deans and Directors
VCAA Dr. Ige
April 5, 2005
Develop report form
  • Utilize program priority form or modify to accommodate these programs.
All Deans and Directors
VCAADr. Ige
April 5, 2005
Identify programs and services
  • Use definition to decide which programs and services are academic support programs
All Deans and Directors
VCAADr. Ige
April 5, 2005
Integrate work of Centers Review Committee
  • Review findings and determine whether their work can be integrated into this work.
All Deans and Directors
VCAADr. Ige
August 2, 2005
Begin prioritization process
  • Score all programs and services on evaluation form
All Deans and Directors
VCAA
December 6, 2005
Complete prioritization
  • Put programs into growth, sustain, and redevelopment categories based on ratings.
  • Report findings to Vice Chancellors, Cabinet and Chancellor on program priority chart.
All Deans and Director
VCAA

Product 3: Determination of future of academic programs in 3rd Tier.
Completion Dates
Actions
Responsibility
Report
March 1, 2005 Determine criteria for deciding future of academic programs in 3 rd Tier
  • Determine criteria for deciding whether program will be reorganized, redeveloped or discontinued.
All Deans and Directors
Faculty Organization
APComittee
VCAA Ige
March 1, 2005 Develop Evaluation form
  • Either use program priority form or adapt it for this process
All Deans and Directors
Faculty Organization
APComittee
VCAA Ige
March 1, 2005 Meet with APC to agree on criteria and form Selected Deans and Directors, VCAA
APC
VCAA Ige
March 1, 2005 Gather data
  • Collect data to complete evaluation form
  • Score forms
All Deans and Directors VCAA Ige
March 22, 2005 Meet with APC to review scores All Deans and Directors
Faculty Organization
APComittee
VCAA Ige
April 5, 2005 Complete prioritization
  • Place programs in growth, sustain, or redevelopment categories
All Deans and Directors VCAA Ige
April 12, 2005 Report Decision to Vice Chancellor, Cabinet and Chancellor
  • Complete program priority chart
All Deans and Directors VCAA Ige

2005 Strategic Planning Outcome 5 Deliverables