Strategic Planning Committee

Outcome 5

Product 1: Vice Chancellors will prioritize support programs.
Completion Dates	Actions	Responsilility	Report
March 1, 2005	The VCs will review criteria Previously considered criteria will be reviewed to determine if these criteria are still valid. Establish criteria for program definition.	Cabinet	Marilyn Vasquez
March 1, 2005	The VCs will agree on the report form Form needs to be developed.	Cabinet	Marilyn Vasquez
March 1, 2005	The VCs will identify all support programs Discussion on previous methodology of identifying programs. Review to program list to determine if all support programs have been identified.	Cabinet	Marilyn Vasquez
August 2, 2005	Begin prioritization process Score all programs on evaluation form	Cabinet
December 6, 2005	Complete prioritization process Put programs into growth, sustain, and redevelopment categories based on ratings. Report by completing program priority chart.	Cabinet	Marilyn Vasquez

Product 2: Deans and Directors will prioritize academic support programs.
Completion Dates	Actions	Responsilbilty	Report
April 5, 2005	Decide on criteria for review Review program priority criteria and adapt to academic support programs Do we need to check with Cabinet on the criteria they are using to define a program?	All Deans and Directors	VCAA Dr. Ige
April 5, 2005	Develop report form Utilize program priority form or modify to accommodate these programs.	All Deans and Directors	VCAADr. Ige
April 5, 2005	Identify programs and services Use definition to decide which programs and services are academic support programs	All Deans and Directors	VCAADr. Ige
April 5, 2005	Integrate work of Centers Review Committee Review findings and determine whether their work can be integrated into this work.	All Deans and Directors	VCAADr. Ige
August 2, 2005	Begin prioritization process Score all programs and services on evaluation form	All Deans and Directors	VCAA
December 6, 2005	Complete prioritization Put programs into growth, sustain, and redevelopment categories based on ratings. Report findings to Vice Chancellors, Cabinet and Chancellor on program priority chart.	All Deans and Director	VCAA

Product 3: Determination of future of academic programs in 3rd Tier.
Completion Dates	Actions	Responsibility	Report
March 1, 2005	Determine criteria for deciding future of academic programs in 3 rd Tier Determine criteria for deciding whether program will be reorganized, redeveloped or discontinued.	All Deans and Directors Faculty Organization APComittee	VCAA Ige
March 1, 2005	Develop Evaluation form Either use program priority form or adapt it for this process	All Deans and Directors Faculty Organization APComittee	VCAA Ige
March 1, 2005	Meet with APC to agree on criteria and form	Selected Deans and Directors, VCAA APC	VCAA Ige
March 1, 2005	Gather data Collect data to complete evaluation form Score forms	All Deans and Directors	VCAA Ige
March 22, 2005	Meet with APC to review scores	All Deans and Directors Faculty Organization APComittee	VCAA Ige
April 5, 2005	Complete prioritization Place programs in growth, sustain, or redevelopment categories	All Deans and Directors	VCAA Ige
April 12, 2005	Report Decision to Vice Chancellor, Cabinet and Chancellor Complete program priority chart	All Deans and Directors	VCAA Ige