Strategic Planning Committee

Outcome 5

Engagement Activities (number of feedback loops, sessions held, meetings, etc.)	Frequent meetings of the non-academic outcome 5 committee. Spent about 180,000 person-seconds working on these issues. Achieved brilliant conclusions and resolved most of the issues troubling our campus. The Academic Priority Committee added this issue to its regular agenda and agreed on the resolution. Original plan for introduction of non-academic programs considered and discussed by: Faculty Organization’s Executive Committee, Dean’s Council and Cabinet. At the end, the plan for introduction of non-academic programs was rejected by the Cabinet in favor of status quo.
Number of People Responding	10-20 for non-academic programs. 10-20 for academic programs.
Range of People Responding (example: students, faculty, staff, etc.)	Strategic Planning Committee Faculty and Staff on the non-academic committee. Faculty in Academic Priority Committee. Deans in Dean’s Council. Cabinet
Summary of Actual Outcome Achieved	The program prioritization process has established a way to address introduction of new programs and prioritization of existing support programs.
Results of Outcome	Done Deal!
List of committee members who contributed to Outcome (same persons will be invited to attend celebration event on the evening of 2/17/05)	Bill Durkin Scott Fulk Kathy Horvath Iztok Hozo Marianne Malyj Kathryn Manteuffel Katheryne Pavey Michelle Searer Cindy Szymanski